A recent research review featured in npj Climate Action challenges the notion that ecotourism can function as a viable solution for decarbonizing the tourism industry.
The study's authors—including Professor Emeritus Ralf Buckley from Griffith University, Professor Linsheng Zhong from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Professor Stefan Gössling from Lund University in Sweden—assert that although ecotourism may provide significant conservation advantages and enhance visitor management, it lacks the capacity to offset or substantially decrease carbon emissions associated with tourism, particularly those stemming from aviation and large hotel operations.
Professor Buckley emphasized that assertions from the research suggesting ecotourism's ability to drive decarbonization could be misappropriated by the tourism and aviation sectors. He remarked, "These claims could indeed act as 'pretenses' that postpone meaningful regulatory initiatives, validate ongoing emissions increases, and facilitate further commercial developments—often referred to as 'land grabs'—within publicly protected areas."
Utilizing global data alongside an in-depth case study from China’s Jiuzhaigou Forest Reserve, the authors observed that the climate advantages of ecotourism are largely insignificant in comparison to the emissions resulting from extensive tourist travel.
While acknowledging that ecotourism can produce noteworthy conservation results in certain situations, the authors stressed that it cannot fundamentally reform or decarbonize the tourism sector, which remains entrenched in high-emission practices and resistant to necessary policy changes such as eliminating aviation fuel subsidies or curbing air travel demand.
"Assertions that suggest otherwise are both scientifically unfounded and politically hazardous," Professor Buckley noted. He provided perspective on the structural challenges, including the lifespan of aircraft and engine types, adding that the argument for ecotourism as a compensatory measure merely serves as a political rationale to promote increased tourism within national parks.
In conclusion, the authors argued that achieving industry-wide decarbonization necessitates significant institutional reforms, particularly concerning subsidies and fuel-tax exemptions. They stated, "Ecotourism can occasionally yield local benefits, but it is far too limited in scale to decarbonize the global tourism sector."
Share this story