Hacker-City
Hacker-City
Get the brief
Business|March 26, 2026|2 min read

Everyone hates Ticketmaster. Why’d Trump go easy on them?

This article discusses the Justice Department's unexpected settlement in the Live Nation antitrust lawsuit and what it could mean for future federal antitrust actions.

#Ticketmaster#Live Nation#antitrust#Trump#DOJ#lawsuit

Everyone hates Ticketmaster. Why’d Trump go easy on them?

The Justice Department’s recent settlement with Live Nation raises critical questions regarding the trajectory of federal antitrust policy.

By Nilay Patel, Mar 26, 2026, 11:31 AM EDT

In today's episode of Decoder, we delve into the significant antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and the implications of the Justice Department's unexpected decision to settle its involvement in the case during the Trump administration, amidst ongoing litigation from various states such as New York, California, and Texas.

While Live Nation may not be a household name, its subsidiary Ticketmaster is well-known and often criticized. Longtime listeners of Decoder may remember our 2023 episode, which covered the controversy surrounding Ticketmaster's website crash during the high-demand ticket sales for Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, leading to significant scrutiny from Congress.

In 2024, the Department of Justice initiated an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation with the goal of separating Ticketmaster from its parent company, aiming to address issues of predatory pricing and soaring ticket fees. This initiative was considered a robust bipartisan effort to confront monopolistic conduct within the ticketing sector.

However, the landscape shifted dramatically with the arrival of the Trump administration. In February, the DOJ's antitrust chief, Gail Slater, was ousted, and soon after, the government opted to settle its claims just as the Live Nation trial was set to begin. This settlement faced backlash for perceived leniency in the terms agreed upon.

Allegations have emerged suggesting that Trump may have intervened to fast-track the settlement process, raising concerns about potential corruption. Nonetheless, despite this settlement, the fight against Live Nation continues, with several U.S. states and districts alleging that the company maintains an illegal monopoly in the ticketing industry.

The DOJ's settlement prompts important discussions about the current direction of antitrust enforcement in the United States, particularly in light of ongoing cases involving major technology companies such as Apple and Amazon.

Joining us for an in-depth analysis of these developments is Lauren Feiner, our resident court expert.

Share this story